December 5, 2012
Would Yankees fans ‘YOUK’?
July 5, 2012
David Ortiz, Red Sox proving clubhouse chemistry is important
He's the team's best player, sure, but he's only a designated hitter. And he's 36 years old. The Red Sox' deal was more than fair. Put a cork in it, Papi.
All of this ranting about the media and his contract reminds me of Gary Sheffield, who memorably complained about his three-year, $39 million deal, among other things, with the Yankees.
August 13, 2010
Discussion: Team chemistry and “clutch”
I hate to deviate away from the Yankees when they’re winning like this, but sometimes I like to analyze general baseball issues too. Give this article from The Faster Times a read: Can Team Chemistry and Clutch Hitting Be Analyzed Better?
It discusses two controversial subjects that I always love to discuss. I’ve touched on team chemistry on this blog before, and I still stand by my opinions, but not so much on the idea of “clutch” players.
The Faster Times article links you to an article from the Wall Street Journal yesterday about Francisco Cervelli’s clutch hitting. You can look deep into the numbers, and I mean, really deep, but in some situations I think observational analysis is more valuable than statistical analysis.
“[Cervelli’s] at-bats throughout the season with runners in scoring position have been real good,” Yankees hitting coach Kevin Long said. “Some people really bear down and they seize the moment, so to speak, a little bit more than others, and he seems to be one of those guys.”
I think Long describes clutch hitting perfectly here. Broadcasters will toss around that term loosely, but isn’t being “clutch” really just seizing the moment?
I believe team chemistry can generate wins, not just vice versa, and I believe some players are better at seizing the moment than others. I’m also willing to bet that, although they may seem like unrelated ideas, these two concepts go hand in hand.
I’d love to hear your take on both these concepts in the comments.
March 3, 2010
Touching on team chemistry, again
I’ve spoke on team chemistry before, and after yesterday’s Yankee Olympics, I felt now was a good time to bring it up again.
This was the second year in a row Joe Girardi brought his team out like this. Last year it was pool (Mariano Rivera owned). This year it was Indy Car racing video games, Skee ball, and Pop-a-shot. Check out the article I linked to for the winners (you’d be surprised!).
When I brought up team chemistry last year, a lot of people told me that it really doesn’t make that much of an impact on a team. Well, I don’t think Girardi believes that.
Last year, the Yankees ended nearly a decade-long drought without a World Series win. Some say it was a loaded team that had no excuse to lose the World Series. But others, including me, say that last year’s team was special, which is a vital ingredient for champions.
So was last year’s team special because of that pool event? Or was it Nick Swisher and Johnny Damon screwing around in the clubhouse all season? I think a combination of both.
I say, yesterday’s field trip did a lot more good than bad for this team. It’s the perfect icebreaker. Plus, Mark Teixeira agrees with me. And he’s Mr. Perfect.
November 15, 2009
My thoughts on team chemistry (audio)
I blurted out my thoughts on the importance of team chemistry on my friend Andrew Vazzano’s radio show. Listen in over at his blog. I come in around 55 seconds.
What are your thoughts on the matter?
